DISSOCIATIVE IDENTITY DISORDER
THE CASE OF SHIRLEY A. MASON “SYBIL”
Medium: Jorge Raul Olguin.
Entity that came to dialogue: Master Ruanel.
Interlocutor: The question I want to ask you is related to Shirley Ardell Mason which was the true name of the case of a multiple personality disorder called “Sybil.” I read the information I found on the internet about her case and her personalities for the record:
The question is if the spirits of error or “demons” had influence on her or it was directly an engramic problem.
Ruanel: They were engrams from past lives, and it is a case in which -without undermining Psychology-, since Psychology somehow can improve symptoms because what the patient is looking for is contention, the problem has to do with the mental decoder.
Interlocutor: I don’t understand.
Ruanel: When the engramas are many and so varied the consequence is that they alter, they modify, they worsen the genetic part of a baby and she already had the tendency that in the course of time her decoder entered in short circuit. Her mind entered in short circuit in such way that not even the technique of Psychoauditing which remove engrams was able to improve her because she had her mental decoder very damaged.
Interlocutor: To what extent did Sybil have her decoder damaged?
Ruanel: She had her decoder so damaged that she had memories isolated in her decoder.
Interlocutor: Of past lives?
Ruanel: Of past lives and her present life, and she had a total disconnection with her thetan to such point that her incarnated part acknowledge herself in a way with certain attitude, and after a while she didn't remember what she had done and she looked at herself in a different way. For that reason the traditional Psychology assumed she had several personalities.
Interlocutor: They said she had around 15 or 16 different personalities. is it correct?
Ruanel: She had 15 personalities, and each one of them ignored what the others did. As a spiritual entity I have to clarify that it wasn’t that each one of the personalities ignored to the others, but rather a part of her decoder denied the information to the other part...
But it was a false denial because she herself was the one who was denying. it was like she went through a problem in her life and she didn’t remember those years of her life or it was as if they passed quickly because she didn't want to remember those years. It was her own denial. There are different kinds of denial. There, the spirit doesn't have anything to do.
Interlocutor: And what kind of relationship would the roles of ego have?
Ruanel: Of course, the roles of ego, worsened, they fed all the personalities, because she also made the role of victim, guilt complex and an endless things more, dissension, the famous “I didn’t do it”, “I don't remember doing that thing”, etc.
Interlocutor: Did she get better with the psychiatrist who assisted her? I mean to the doctor Cornelia B. Wilbur.
Ruanel: It doesn’t exist in the physical plan a therapy that can modify the being when he/she has dissociative identity disorder because in this case the decoder is in short circuit.
Nevertheless, in some cases, and don't be astonished of what I say, there are moments where a stimulation with a small tension generated in the decoder accommodates some pieces.
I clarify it, and I am translating this very slow to that the decoder of this vessel interprets the concept correctly. It accommodates the pieces somehow so that the person reasons, I am not speaking of a cure, I am speaking about accommodating pieces, about a small invasion.
Interlocutor: I understand.
Ruanel: It can be a momentary hostile act, but it is also a hostile act to vaccinate a baby and however the consequence of that vaccination will save the life of the creature before certain illness could kill him.
In this case, this small invasion of an electrical tension can end up accommodating some altered pieces.
Interlocutor: Of what kind of artifacts are we speaking? I already know we are not talking about the famous “electroshock”
Ruanel: We are speaking of absolutely modern devices that even in the time of Sybil didn't exist. I am referring to the present, and they are absolutely measured and they modify the neuronal communication in such way that if there is a part which is in short circuit, this procedure isolates it from the rest so that the person could live sometimes an almost normal life.
Interlocutor: Would you have recommended Dianetics to Sybil?
Ruanel: Being incarnated I would.
Interlocutor: Not Psychaudition?
Ruanel: I mean that being incarnated I would have recommended Dianetics to her, but at this time no.
Interlocutor: I don’t understand what you tell me, Master.
Ruanel: At this time no, because now I know, things that being incarnated I didn't know. She wouldn’t have improved her neuronal part, not even with Psychoauditing.
Interlocutor: Now I understood.
Ruanel: Psychauditing eliminates, it eradicates 100% completely of engrams not 99%, but if the engrams already damaged the mental decoder, it is impossible to modify that situation, For instance, if you sever your finger with a machine, Psychoauditing won’t make it grow again.
Interlocutor: Is it clear. To conclude, Did she also bring personalities of previous lives? I don’t remember if you mentioned it.
Ruanel: She brought engrams of past lives that altered her decoder in such way that they fractioned her mind.
Interlocutor: The question I’d like to ask now is: Was one of the key personalities of Sybil “Victoria”? Was there some “Victoria” in a past life of hers that had that personality?
Ruanel: She had a high power of reception of her thetan and she could capture lucubrations of her thetan. But that happened at the beginning, then directly she was disconnected completely from her thetan and she stopped capturing her thetan. Her spiritual part wanted somehow to moderate the situation, but it was not listened.
What happens is that at the beginning that reception did her more bad than good because there was a part of that personality that directly remembered other lives, or what she believed were other lives, and it altered her definitely. Her decoder entered in short ciucuit, it burned.
Interlocutor: Well, I believe that this matter is clear enough, if you agree we’ll stop here.
Ruanel: Okay, See you later.
Interlocutor: See you later, Master, and thank you.
This entry was posted at Tuesday, October 20, 2009 and is filed under Medical Science . You can follow any responses to this entry through the .