THE PAST LIFE REGRESSION
THE CASE OF BRIAN L. WEISS
A DANGEROUS PSYCHIATRIST
IS HYPNOTIC REGRESSION DANGEROUS?
When a psychiatrist uses his patients as if they were “guinea pigs” to experiment and learn something that was already discovered half a century ago by Ron Hubbard. The least we can say about him is that he is irresponsible. Hopefully one day Psychiatry will become an obsolete science.
In addition, Dr. Brian Weiss doesn’t know about the reactive mind and engrams and using past-life therapy, as he does, he could actually provoke a bigger problem in the mind of his patients with unpredictable consequences.
Medium: Jorge Raul Olguin.
Entity that came to dialogue: Master Ruanel.
Interlocutor: I want to ask a question about hypnotism. With hypnotism can we go through past lives?
Ruanel: With hypnotism one can regress to past lives.
Interlocutor: Concretely then, with hypnotism one is able to regress to past lives, something that cannot be made with Dianetics or Scientology. Is it correct?
Ruanel: Correct. With hypnosis and with hypnotism one can regress to past lives perfectly verifiable. What happens is that, obviously, a series of engrams stay with the 10% incarnated who has lived those experiences. Because it is different when the person regress to past lives to when the person witness the Psychoauditing of his own Thetan.
If the person is seated comfortably and sees how the medium tells a story, he is seeing it in an impersonal way.
Ruanel: But if the person is "forced" to regress, the person somehow remembers those lives and revives those experiences, and that creates engrams and even reinforces conceptual engrams also.
Interlocutor: Then Hypnotism is not an advisable system is it?
Ruanel: Of course not.
Interlocutor: Let’s see if I understand. Neither hypnotic regression nor light hypnotism is advisable. Is it correct?
Interlocutor: And what are they good for?
Ruanel: Well, a doctor in the United States could proof through hypnotic regression the truth of past lives. He Hypnotized a lady who said she had lived a past life in Ireland, and later on, when she traveled to this country she could verify convincingly that he had lived there in the XIX century.
Interlocutor: Master, I have a doubt because you said in an opportunity that the hypnotism was not the enemy, that is to say when knowing Dianetics it could be used efficiently. Do you mean that hypnotism is not the enemy when the person who performs it knows Dianetics?
Interlocutor: Could an auditor of Dianetics use hypnotism concretely to perform regressions to past lives and eliminate engrams as long as he commands or suggests the order to the person to not record any engram?
Ruanel: Correct. But he would have to be a very good auditor. I comment you that Jorge, my vessel, has performed a kind of light hypnosis with a young girl where he took her to a past life and he has given her that suggestion you mention, and when she returned she did it with a state of happiness – I clarify not implanted, otherwise it would be an engram over an engram-. And she was with such euphoria as if she had gone to a picnic or a festivity in a sunny day.
Interlocutor: Which would be the difference between light hypnosis and the dianetic trance?
Ruanel: In light hypnosis the person is alert at every moment, the person feels more protected. There are many people who, due to engramic problems, they are afraid of all kind of hypnosis because they feel as if they were defenseless at the hands of the therapist. And it doesn’t matter if the therapist is the best auditor because the person himself will create defenselessness engrams.
Interlocutor: And which would be the difference of the trance of light hypnosis with the trance of Dianetics, where as you know the person is also alert?
Ruanel: It is very similar.
Interlocutor: I don’t understand well. With the light hypnosis one can go through past lives and not with Dianetics? I ask it because we have already clarified that with Dianetics one cannot go through past lives.
Ruanel: But with light hypnosis this can be done. What happens is that when the person is sleeping, fainted or unconscious, the analytic mind is disconnected and the reactive mind is alert. You already know that.
Ruanel: With light hypnosis the analytic mind is connected.
Interlocutor: Well, but in the dianetic trance the analytic mind is also connected.
Ruanel: Perfect, but the dianetic trance doesn't take to the person to past lives due to the incapacity of the auditor.
Interlocutor: Let’s see if I understood. If the auditor knew about past lives and he were capable to take to the auditee to a previous life, would he do it then?
Ruanel: Yes, he could do it.
Interlocutor: Concretely then, to regress to past lives the light hypnosis would be the same thing to the dianetic trance?
Ruanel: Correct, but the light hypnosis, for he who doesn't know anything about Dianetics, it could generate engrams to the auditee, and this even though he is contained and with the analytic mind alert.
Interlocutor: Master, and why do you say that in the technology of Dianetics and Scientology one cannot regress to past lives?
Ruanel: On one hand, one doesn’t regress to past lives due to incapacity of the auditors, and on the other hand, when I was embodied I left that issue unconcluded in the technology, fearing that that incapacity of the auditors provoke damages in the auditees.
Interlocutor: Could we say that in the time you were incarnated the things were not favorable for you to develop a technology capable to regress to past lives?
Interlocutor: I remember reading a book of yours that if the auditee regresses to past lives, the incidents he tells should be audited in the same way the incidents of his present life are audited.
Ruanel: But that is logical! Keep in mind that in that moment the auditor is conversing with the role of the auditee in a past life of the one who had that experience. The issue now is that the auditors are riding the victory horse; they are pure arrogance, something I didn't teach when I was incarnated. I always taught Humbleness. The current auditors give more importance to other topics and they distorted the teachings I gave.
Interlocutor: Concretely, then, it is better that the auditors don't know anything about auditing past lives to avoid they provoke more damages than benefits to the auditees due to their lack of understanding in the technique.
Ruanel: Correct. I have apprehension that the auditors don't know how to guide to the auditees in those past lives, and if that person revives those experiences, added to the present experiences, instead of clarifying them, they would darken them implanting more engrams.
Interlocutor: Recently I discussed with an auditor telling him that the technology of Dianetics and Scientology does not regress to past lives, but he argued with me.
Ruanel: I repeat that by means of these techniques one cannot take to the people to experience the roles of past lives or audit those experiences. Although I founded a base, the knowledge I had in that moment when I was incarnated was infinitely inferior to the knowledge I have now as pure spirit. Even now, all this time I learned very much through the investigations of Johnakan.
Of course they had the base to audit previous lives, but the single knowledge of how to guide to a role to those experiences. Not knowing anything about roles of ego and all these things. It wouldn't be good to audit efficiently without producing any damage in the auditee.
What I want to clarify is that I abstained from deepening in the technology of auditing past lives, fearing that the technique were distorted and it provoked more damages than benefits.
Interlocutor: Has Some auditor of Dianetics or Scientology, although by chance, audited well to some person?
Ruanel: I respond categorically NO, not in this planet, no auditor of Dianetics or Scientology has clarified anybody auditing past lives, because they don't have the technology to achieve it and they don’t know the roles of ego either. The only one who has achieved it has been this vessel with Psychoauditing.
Interlocutor: Could we say that if an auditor takes the simple enunciation you gave in the technology that one can go through past lives, and arbitrarily he does apply it although this one be only a sketch, the responsibility for the disorders caused are entirely of that auditor?
Ruanel: Of course! No auditor of Dianetics or Scientology should guide to the auditee to incidents of past lives.
Interlocutor: And if the auditee goes through the incidents of past lives on his own?
Ruanel: Simply audit them as if it they were incidents of this life, but nothing else.
Interlocutor: so, the auditor should not have part on this.
Interlocutor: Well, I believe that this matter has been properly clarified.
Interlocutor: Now I want to approach a topic I consider extremely important, I refer to hypnotism. Some time ago I asked you about this issue and you told me that "hypnotism is not the enemy", and although in that moment I didn't research about it because I had other questions to ask, the answer intrigued me and I had it scheduled. Concretely, is there some way to practice hypnotism to heal?
Ruanel: The secret is that the person doesn’t have to be in defenselessness. One can perform hypnotism when the person is conscious.
Interlocutor: But isn't that when the person is hypnotized, at the same time he is unconscious, that is to say, the person is with the analytic mind disconnected or at least very reduced?
Ruanel: There is a middle term where the person can be with the analytic mind alert, even being hypnotized.
Interlocutor: Is it possible to command to a hypnotized person so that he be partly conscious and partly unconscious?
Ruanel: The operator doesn't have to command, because giving an order is implanting engrams. Therefore, what the operator has to do is to suggest to the person - to suggest, not to command -, when the person is being taken to the alpha state so that he will be with the analytic mind alert mind and with higher defenses, and being also alert he will be able to regress what he lived in this life or even to regress to past lives.
When the person is in an alert state, he won't be implanted with any engram and therefore it won’t be an engram that manipulates him. That’s simple.
Interlocutor: But it’s the same thing what an auditor does with dianetic therapy! I mean that the person is told he will be alert and all those things.
Ruanel: This is a step more advanced than Dianetics, because the person is in a state of torpor that makes easier the regression, because he can arrive to an alpha state and at the same time he will be alert. But I repeat that before he has to be influenced not commanded.
Interlocutor: Is this technique applied on Earth?
Ruanel: No, not yet.
Interlocutor: Could we call to this technique hypnosis or something similar?
Ruanel: This technique itself is light hypnosis. This vessel has already tested it in angelic sessions, when people were put in this state to make contact with their angel or with their thetans.
Interlocutor: I confirm it, in my own personal experience. I remember I have practiced this technique with this vessel and I have listened to a message from my Thetan. Concretely, Is the technique of light hypnosis superior than Dianetics?
Ruanel: Sure, because the technique of Dianetics puts the person into a very light trance, the more alert the person is, the more difficult will be to the person to go through the line of time.
Interlocutor: I understand.
Ruanel: The state of light hypnosis in alpha state gives place to the other part of the person to go through past lives or to make contact with his angel or his Thetan
Interlocutor: Do you confirm, then that aside from this vessel nobody has tested this technique?
Ruanel: Yes, I confirm it to you.
Interlocutor: And the regressions performed by hypnotists to past lives?
Ruanel: They do it with total hypnosis, that is to say, the person is completely hypnotized. When the person is completely hypnotized he is totally reactive, and all that the operator tells him is implanted as an engram.
Interlocutor: But that means when he wakes up he is like a garbage can, figuratively speaking!
Ruanel: When the person wakes up, he returns to his analytic state with engrams, drives, and he can even have convulsions. It would be something similar to Transpersonal Psychology not well performed. There are even cases of transpersonal Psychology where, through holotropic breathwork, the person has been taken to altered states of consciousness, and he has rendered completely aggressive to the point of hitting and hurting to the therapist severely.
Interlocutor: Now, Does the person with total hypnosis go through past lives?
Ruanel: Yes, he does, but he doesn't solve anything.
Interlocutor: According to your explanation, I see that at the present time, and as long as these things are unknown, it is necessary to promote the elimination of hypnotism and we could call it “engramic hypnotism” instead.
Ruanel: …And promote the light hypnosis at the same time and necessarily we should look for a name for this technique.
Interlocutor: I would call it directly “non engramic hypnosis” or “light hypnosis”.
Ruanel: Either of them is valid.
Interlocutor: The state of light hypnosis, in which the person is alert, Would it be something similar to the state the medium is into when channeling?
Ruanel: Correct. For example, this vessel at this time is 100% totally alert and he doesn't allow the implant of any engram. This is important to clarify it, because there are mediums in Africa or Brazil who channel spirits of error, and they are not completely alert, therefore they receive engrams, as a result , they collapse prey from convulsions on the ground and they injure themselves.
Interlocutor: Well, I believe that this topic is clear perfectly.
This entry was posted at Sunday, September 06, 2009 and is filed under Therapies . You can follow any responses to this entry through the .