Posted in


Medium: Jorge Raul Olguin.

Entity that came to dialogue: Master Ruanel.
Interlocutor: Well, another of the topics that I have scheduled to ask is related to circumcision, which is a very controversial issue. I believe that it’s nonsense already. What do you say?
Ruanel: What I will say, it’s not only my saying, but rather all the Masters of Light who are with me are supporting me at this time. Circumcision, today, in the current XXI century is unnecessary because what they don't keep in mind is that in old times circumcision was performed fundamentally for a matter of hygiene, not because of a religious issue.
All that comes from the old Judaism, like the quarantine, not to fornicate, or circumcision itself was merely due to a sanitary matter.
There was a great number of male genital diseases and they tried to prevent them by means of circumcision.
Interlocutor: Did they give a religious sense in order to foment circumcision then?
Ruanel: Correct. In the XXI century circumcision doesn't make any sense, except for those countries with scarcity, there is a quite good hygiene. To such point that both people, a circumcised person and an uncircumcised have the same risk factor, I mean, zero risk if they take care and a lot of risk if they don't take care of themselves as well.
Interlocutor: What is the function of the foreskin? Some doctors speak that its function is to give more sensitivity or more pleasure during sex.
Ruanel: I will try to explain it. It is a matter of less sensitivity, For example, you have more tickles in the sole of your foot than in your palm of your hand.
Interlocutor: That’s right
Ruanel: Well, Do you know why? For a very simple reason because the sole of the foot is not a very exposed surface. For example, in those tropical countries where people are used to walk barefoot permanently, their feet form callosities, then, tickling the soles of the feet have lesser effect than tickling the palms of the hands.
Then, in the places where the skin has not been touched, it has more sensitivity. For that reason I gave the example of the hands and the feet.
With the glans penis happens exactly the same thing. If the foreskin protects the glans penis, when pulling the foreskin back there is a more sensitivity, which generally is advantageous during oral sex, Fellatio.
Interlocutor: I understand.
Ruanel: When having a circumcision, the same close touch of the glans skin, the head of the penis, lose sensitivity and it’s not so accessible to oral sex.
On the other hand, circumcision has one advantage- obviously this doesn't mean we support it-. When not having sensitivity in that area of the penis, there are fewer cases of premature ejaculation and the male's coitus can last more time before reaching orgasm.
What I say is a matter of common sense. Premature ejaculation generally takes place for two reasons: the first one is psychological that is to say, for anxiety, we already know that it doesn’t even have to do with close contact or sensitivity. In this case a man penetrates a woman and in few seconds he reaches an orgasm. And if he reaches an orgasm in seconds, there one realizes that it is a matter related to anxiety.
The second reason happens in those cases in which there is no anxiety and therefore the ejaculation can be more controlled. If there is more sensitivity, the ejaculation will always be quicker, if there is less sensitivity surely it will make him last a little longer.
Interlocutor: And who would remove the engram from the circumcised person provoked by the surgery? Would not this help to be against circumcision?
Ruanel: Of course, but it is a topic that I plan to talk about later on. Now I want to explain another thing.
The human being, I repeat, performed this surgery throughout thousands of years for hygiene. Today he only performs it for tradition.
Interlocutor: But I suppose that some doctors perform it for money or for some "abstraction engram" I mean, obviously, about an engram with verbal content like “I must get rid of it" or something similar.
Ruanel: Yes, but who request to the doctor so that he circumcises a baby?
Interlocutor: Well, the parents…
Ruanel: And why do they ask for it?
Interlocutor: Now I understand, they ask it for tradition. I mean a father will never request to a doctor that he circumcises his son for hygiene.
Ruanel: Exactly, at this time circumcision is only performed for tradition.
Interlocutor: Not even for a matter of hygiene or cleanliness?
Ruanel: Today? No, of course not, let’s speak with common sense.
Interlocutor: Okay, but these doctors who perform circumcision speak wonderful things about circumcision, at least that’s what I read on the internet.
Ruanel: Yes, but what are their arguments?
Interlocutor: Fundamentally, they speak about prevention, about a matter of hygiene.
Ruanel: But we are in the XXI century! What lack of hygiene are we talking about? Please! The only thing that it is necessary to do is to pull back the foreskin and wash that area. If we speak of hygiene, then we should also have to speak of the woman's vagina.
Interlocutor: But those doctors that propitiate circumcision must be very aberrated!
Ruanel: Of course they are, and also those who perform circumcision for business, like those doctors that implant silicones in the breasts.
Interlocutor: I see that.
Ruanel: Let’s move on now to the second part. I ratify that circumcision creates an engram in the creature, and it is an engram of painful aggression.
Interlocutor: Master before you continue I want to ask you about the difference between a surgery, where pain is present without anesthesia and a surgery with anesthesia. I mean, which one creates a more harmful engram?
Ruanel: The more harmful engram is created under a surgery performed without anesthesia. An engram is a physical pain that is implanted as a neuronal mark.
Interlocutor: The problem is that the doctors who perform circumcision don’t know anything about the reactive mind and engrams and the aftereffect that any surgery leaves inevitably even if it’s performed with or without anesthesia and this goes beyond the matter of hygiene or business.
Ruanel: Obviously they ignore it, with the aggravating circumstance that they can cause the baby emotional pain, even when the baby doesn't even reason, and then the engram will be conceptual at Thetan’s level.
And the seriousness of this engram is that it cannot be eradicated, not even with Dianetic auditing.
Interlocutor: Definitely, even if the doctors lessen their responsibility for their ignorance, objectively, circumcision is a little less than a criminal act.
Ruanel: Correct.
Interlocutor: Does the foreskin have some relationship with the G-Spot?
Ruanel: No, not at all.
Interlocutor: Concretely, to conclude this topic, what is the function of the foreskin then?
Ruanel: It simply helps to avoid that the glans penis loses sensitivity. Also, it humidifies the area of the penis so that a better penetration can be achieved in the vagina.
Interlocutor: Now I understood. Well, I believe that this issue is perfectly clear.
The mutilation of the clitoris is neither a custom nor a religious rite, but simply and plainly an aberration. The fight, therefore, is not against the customs or religious rites, but against the aberration, and the best way to do it is spreading massively the existence of the reactive mind and engrams. How else can we fight against an aberration if we don’t know its true origin? Once this knowledge becomes widely known, the fight will be won in a 50 %.
The real problems of FGM begin after the painful mutilation, since the circumcised women suffer hemorrhages, problems with their menstruation, renal infections and more. In addition, sexual relations and childbirth are extremely painful.
Ironically, cleanliness and hygiene are used as a justification for female genital mutilation also: in societies where women have not undergone by this mutilation, they cannot carry water or prepare food because they believe they are not pure. These societies consider that the female genitals are "ugly" and "dirty", and therefore, its mutilation is necessary. There are even tribes that belief that if the clitoris is not mutilated it would grow like a male sexual organ, or if it touches the male penis, he will die.
In conclusion, if we know the mechanism of the reactive mind, we would also know the mechanism of the justification. Someone who receives an engram that dictates the "need" to mutilate the clitoris would force his analytical mind to justify such aberrant behavior; An engram is irrational by definition and it’s also hidden. This is the reason of countless justifying absurdities that are practiced on planet Earth.
Email Received:

Dear Professor:
When my first son was born, 3 pediatricians who checked him said to me that he had phimosis and they advised me to perform a circumcision.
Unfortunately, we didn’t question this advice and we didn’t find out a more detailed info on this matter since my husband was also circumcised and it was a common practice back then. I suppose that the anesthesia my baby received worked very well since he did not suffer very much. Thanks God, he didn’t have consequences and he recovered quickly.
Five years have passed and my question is: How can I help him to erase the engrams that have been created by this surgery? And I’d like to know if this decision of ours created karma on us and how we can deal with it.
We have another baby to whom we also wanted to circumcise, fortunately the doctor told us that circumcision was unnecessary, therefore, we forgot the idea and now that I read the information you showed us, I am happy that my second child did not go through that surgery.
Dear friend:
I believe that you have a misunderstanding. One thing is the practice of an unnecessary surgery due to a mistaken religious belief, and another different is to perform it, if there is no other solution. Phimosis, as far as I know (I am not a doctor), when it is very marked is perfectly solved with a surgery. I know it because I had a friend who had intense pain whenever he had sex and that was inhibiting him. After the surgery he was fine and "perfectly happy"
As for engrams, the technique is Dianetics, but sincerely, I would not worry about it, since to have an engram does not mean that it is restimulated. A person can have thousands of engrams that are never restimulated during life. In fact, Dianetics do not eliminate conceptual engrams the technique in this case would be psychoauditing.

This entry was posted at Friday, April 09, 2010 and is filed under . You can follow any responses to this entry through the .

0 comentarios

Related Posts with Thumbnails